The company has not been prosecuted nor has this Director and Secretary - owner of Global Technical Ltd
Saturday, 17 August 2013
Heather Bolton Heather Vousden
The company has not been prosecuted nor has this Director and Secretary - owner of Global Technical Ltd
Friday, 16 August 2013
The Jury
The jury.
Where did the pool of jurors come from?
Were any planted by HMG?
They had to ensure a conviction.
The question the jury had to ask themselves was
'Did Gary Bolton believe the GT200 worked?'
This is not the question they answered.
The prosecution case collapsed with the UK military and all other subsequent prosecution witnesses saying the GT200 worked.
If they all said it worked, then why couldn't Gary?
Where did the pool of jurors come from?
Were any planted by HMG?
They had to ensure a conviction.
The question the jury had to ask themselves was
'Did Gary Bolton believe the GT200 worked?'
This is not the question they answered.
The prosecution case collapsed with the UK military and all other subsequent prosecution witnesses saying the GT200 worked.
If they all said it worked, then why couldn't Gary?
Scientists
The many scientist who say the GT200 cannot work.
ALL of them did not swear on the bible, why, because GOD is false and cannot be proven.
How many people believe in GOD! Are they all fraudsters?
The ozone layer debacle, global warming, health scares, the world is flat, the sun revolves around the earth. Hell, you can even get homeopathy of the NHS now. Wasn't that proved by scientists to be a fraud. A lot of companies sell, it!!
All through the ages, the scientific community has stuck together and feared to tread outside the norm. Why, because of ridicule.
Everybody has heard of water diving, yes it works, how it works is not fully understood, why, because a lot of scientist are scared to actually try and find out the process.
The GT200, did work but also failed on occasion.
Would it not be better to look into why it works and why we do not always understand when it does not, instead of getting up a lynchmob.
The UK MOD science community has not solved the problem of the IED in Afghanistan. Is the kit they are sending out there fraudulent and not working! Well, something isn't right is it?
Maybe if resources had been pooled a real understanding and solution could have been found and developed but alas the witch hunters and spineless civil servants have won.
The US Sandia report
Sandia is owned by Lockheed Martin, and they co-operate with American companies to develop explosive detection technology. Independent Test organisation. THe report also shows a device labelled as Scandec, why not photograph the device you tested? Make your own mind up.
The Mexican BACAL Mochan has rumoured links with Drug Cartels, approves of their actions, attends court to try to get people arrested with narcotics off, if the GT200 was used in the process. All these occasions narcotics were seized.
He changed the test protocol last minute. The protocol was designed to fail the GT200. The boxes were too close together. Why did BACAL not ask the MOD not send an official observer, to corroborate the results?
UK HSDB and City Of London Police
Global Technical Ltd have never provided a Mole or GT200 for testing by any UK department except the REEST so how can the, over the years, say it doesn't work.. When pushed they confess to having lied and say they didn't bother as they already made their mind up.
The police invited GTL to a test, a number of issues were raised around the test and were ignored by the police. The police and HMG have already stated that they needed this conviction.
Now surprise surprise, our honest Police changed the test that finally took place. It was undertaken by a scientist who already assessed it could not work. Why would the police do that, not to control the result surely.
Why change the test protocol, why not use someone who knew nothing about the device.
Training is always said to take 3 days. This very clever scientist knew exactly how it worked from reading the manual [which clearly states the user MUST attend the course] and after 5 mins was a self confessed expert. The video was a farce, the antenna was pointing all over the place, his technique was poor and even from watching the video very difficult to see how he made his decision.
STRANGE THOUGH
Every scientific test worked when the 'independent' user made a cognitive test to see if the device worked. This means he knew which box it was in.
What does this mean; the government scientist know when there is an indication, they can decide to ignore it but they could know exactly where the sample is each time.
The results of all tests are lower than random, not what you would expect, why is that?
Because they knew where the sample was and wanted the device to be incorrect.
What would have happened if the GT200 has passed the test.
The BBC would have been sued for lying.
HMG would have been sued for false accusations
All the 'honest ' scientists would have lost face as they could not explain how it works.
The tests were never going to pass.
ALL of them did not swear on the bible, why, because GOD is false and cannot be proven.
How many people believe in GOD! Are they all fraudsters?
The ozone layer debacle, global warming, health scares, the world is flat, the sun revolves around the earth. Hell, you can even get homeopathy of the NHS now. Wasn't that proved by scientists to be a fraud. A lot of companies sell, it!!
All through the ages, the scientific community has stuck together and feared to tread outside the norm. Why, because of ridicule.
Everybody has heard of water diving, yes it works, how it works is not fully understood, why, because a lot of scientist are scared to actually try and find out the process.
The GT200, did work but also failed on occasion.
Would it not be better to look into why it works and why we do not always understand when it does not, instead of getting up a lynchmob.
The UK MOD science community has not solved the problem of the IED in Afghanistan. Is the kit they are sending out there fraudulent and not working! Well, something isn't right is it?
Maybe if resources had been pooled a real understanding and solution could have been found and developed but alas the witch hunters and spineless civil servants have won.
The US Sandia report
Sandia is owned by Lockheed Martin, and they co-operate with American companies to develop explosive detection technology. Independent Test organisation. THe report also shows a device labelled as Scandec, why not photograph the device you tested? Make your own mind up.
The Mexican BACAL Mochan has rumoured links with Drug Cartels, approves of their actions, attends court to try to get people arrested with narcotics off, if the GT200 was used in the process. All these occasions narcotics were seized.
He changed the test protocol last minute. The protocol was designed to fail the GT200. The boxes were too close together. Why did BACAL not ask the MOD not send an official observer, to corroborate the results?
UK HSDB and City Of London Police
Global Technical Ltd have never provided a Mole or GT200 for testing by any UK department except the REEST so how can the, over the years, say it doesn't work.. When pushed they confess to having lied and say they didn't bother as they already made their mind up.
The police invited GTL to a test, a number of issues were raised around the test and were ignored by the police. The police and HMG have already stated that they needed this conviction.
Now surprise surprise, our honest Police changed the test that finally took place. It was undertaken by a scientist who already assessed it could not work. Why would the police do that, not to control the result surely.
Why change the test protocol, why not use someone who knew nothing about the device.
Training is always said to take 3 days. This very clever scientist knew exactly how it worked from reading the manual [which clearly states the user MUST attend the course] and after 5 mins was a self confessed expert. The video was a farce, the antenna was pointing all over the place, his technique was poor and even from watching the video very difficult to see how he made his decision.
STRANGE THOUGH
Every scientific test worked when the 'independent' user made a cognitive test to see if the device worked. This means he knew which box it was in.
What does this mean; the government scientist know when there is an indication, they can decide to ignore it but they could know exactly where the sample is each time.
The results of all tests are lower than random, not what you would expect, why is that?
Because they knew where the sample was and wanted the device to be incorrect.
What would have happened if the GT200 has passed the test.
The BBC would have been sued for lying.
HMG would have been sued for false accusations
All the 'honest ' scientists would have lost face as they could not explain how it works.
The tests were never going to pass.
Bloggers
There are many copycat bloggers on the net, many sad individuals who have nothing better to do than bitch.
We know many of the blogs against the GT200 are funded buy the drug cartels. Why would there be such fierce opposition to something that has been proven to work by EVERY client in the field, and keep a lot of drugs from coming to the streets?
Why are they all anonymous, because they are not real honest people.
We know many of the blogs against the GT200 are funded buy the drug cartels. Why would there be such fierce opposition to something that has been proven to work by EVERY client in the field, and keep a lot of drugs from coming to the streets?
Why are they all anonymous, because they are not real honest people.
Tuesday, 13 August 2013
Journalist Challenge
Is there any journalist out there that is actually bothered about making a correct story and one that questions the past, who helped, why and most importantly, what made HMG turn on Global Technical Ltd and single out only one director!!
The BBC, were they in collusion with HMG as HMG knew they had egg on their faces and as we all know, a whiff of a scandal and all those civil servants go into hiding and use the Bart Simpson defence 'what ever it was I didn't do it!!]
The BBC never mentioned their support.
Anyone clever enough to want to print a real story.....
The BBC, were they in collusion with HMG as HMG knew they had egg on their faces and as we all know, a whiff of a scandal and all those civil servants go into hiding and use the Bart Simpson defence 'what ever it was I didn't do it!!]
The BBC never mentioned their support.
Anyone clever enough to want to print a real story.....
Sunday, 11 August 2013
The UK Government part 3
and look here, oops the MOD did help, a lot, what can we do now, how embarrassing for HMG.
Oh, look , no procedure records exist for the REEST, no Original report. Convenient.
Embarrassment is possible for the MOD.
How can the MOD and HMG support a company for 10 years then make a 180 degree turn and then say 'sorry we lead you to buy the GT200 but now you must be stupid for having done so and really stupid for believing the UK government were honest!!'
Oh look here, the government say the EST are not MOD, MOD had nothing to do with promoting the GT200, but read further and it says under SECTION 12 that DSO called the unit the BRITISH ARMY EST. So where are the lies from Global Technical Ltd. Is this not what they said that the UK MOD supported them.
It is incredible to believe that any EST member exhibiting UK kit overseas is going to say when asked 'sorry cannot tell you if this kit is good or bad but who cares it makes the country money'
The UK government have known since GTL inception about the Mole/GT200 and that many people knew it worked and so did nothing what changed
These are the official lines to 'explain' endorsement of products,
Says above that companies will not be supported by HMG if they are likely to embarrass them, yet Global Technical Ltd was supported by HMG, how did that happen? It cannot be because everybody having used the GT200/Mole actually thought it worked was it? But didn't PSDB say it did not work. Make your mind up guys!!
Why wasn't Global Technical Ltd prosecuted?
UK endorsement, of course they endorsed the GT200.
Oh, look , no procedure records exist for the REEST, no Original report. Convenient.
Embarrassment is possible for the MOD.
How can the MOD and HMG support a company for 10 years then make a 180 degree turn and then say 'sorry we lead you to buy the GT200 but now you must be stupid for having done so and really stupid for believing the UK government were honest!!'
It is incredible to believe that any EST member exhibiting UK kit overseas is going to say when asked 'sorry cannot tell you if this kit is good or bad but who cares it makes the country money'
The UK government have known since GTL inception about the Mole/GT200 and that many people knew it worked and so did nothing what changed
These are the official lines to 'explain' endorsement of products,
Why wasn't Global Technical Ltd prosecuted?
UK endorsement, of course they endorsed the GT200.
The UK Government part 2
And now the lies:
Just refer to the REEST [MOD members if I recall!]
Confused, the government are struggling to get their story straight
more press advise
Here they clearly state some people believe the GT200 works!!
That's not what the UK government want though is it
Here is a response to UK MOD pressure
Now the UK government is struggling to ban the legally so are they now trying other tactics,
let's get the right police force to 'investigate ' this, we can get reports, pressure on witnesses, information fed to the media to in flame the situation ?
Just refer to the REEST [MOD members if I recall!]
more press advise
Here they clearly state some people believe the GT200 works!!
That's not what the UK government want though is it
Here is a response to UK MOD pressure
Now the UK government is struggling to ban the legally so are they now trying other tactics,
let's get the right police force to 'investigate ' this, we can get reports, pressure on witnesses, information fed to the media to in flame the situation ?
The UK Government
What did the government know, what did they try to cover up what have they lied about:
So they say they did not know of any work done for Global Technical Ltd by DESO/UKTI/MOD
It was common knowledge as you can see from other documents within this blog.
The MOD have not trialled the GT200 yet state they cannot work and the FCO saying they only found out about the GT200 a short time ago.
Who are they trying to kid. The FCO which includes embassys have been involved in the marketing of the Mole/GT200. Is this the start point of the cover up.
What are they saying here. We haven't trialled the device but we can get our scientists to produce reports if required. How can they if nothing is trialled?
The complaints are about the ADE 651 not the GT200. This fact is constantly ignored and paint all devices with the same brush.
Lets start to bend the export rules is the UK government line without investigating the situation in depth. Peter Mandelson - remember him and the financial scandals. Look it up!!
The media reports that the GT200 is ineffective. Is this paid for by the drug cartels to discredit the GT200?
Is this generated by the opposition of the Army in Thailand?
Here comes the government spin
Press advice for civil servants:
HERE IS MORE Government weasel words to try to get out of the fact that they endorsed UK defence exports.
It was common knowledge as you can see from other documents within this blog.
The MOD have not trialled the GT200 yet state they cannot work and the FCO saying they only found out about the GT200 a short time ago.
Who are they trying to kid. The FCO which includes embassys have been involved in the marketing of the Mole/GT200. Is this the start point of the cover up.
The complaints are about the ADE 651 not the GT200. This fact is constantly ignored and paint all devices with the same brush.
Lets start to bend the export rules is the UK government line without investigating the situation in depth. Peter Mandelson - remember him and the financial scandals. Look it up!!
Is this generated by the opposition of the Army in Thailand?
Here comes the government spin
Press advice for civil servants:
The History
The GT200 History
The device began as the Mole Programmable system. This device was introduced to Global Technical Ltd by Malcolm Rowe. Global Technical Ltd were acting as a sales agent for him.
Malcolm Rowe was interviewed by Police but no charge!
The Mole was introduced to the UK Home office and related to tracking was found to be an interesting item of technology; some members of the organisation were not convinced but no-one thought it fraud.
Tim Sheldon of the Home office in 2000 stated that the product was odd and the technology seemingly related to water divining and followed up this comment with 'If it works on a 'water divining ' principle , this is not an area where we have ANY expertise. Experiments in this area are fraught with difficulty and there is a high potential for all concerned to come out looking stupid and gullible. In other words we will be ridiculed by other scientists if we show it works.
In addition he stated 'It would be hard to defend the operational use of a device which works on no known physical principle even if trials showed that it had some capability' The Mole was never going to be accepted even with positive trials.
The Home office choose not to take any action as they do not consider it to be fraudulent.
Global Technical Ltd is allowed to continue its company activities.
This set the scene for the next 15 years.
1999
In 1999 the British Army; Royal Engineers Export Support team [REEST] were introduced to the Mole and while sceptical were accepting after their initial trials.
Based on their initial trials they offered Global Technical ltd a private venture report - an operational assessment of the Mole. This proved the system worked.
The Royal Engineers Export Support team worked with Global Technical Ltd for 6 years making demonstrations, making tests, advising overseas clients as to the Mole's benefits, and marketing.
REEST are part of DESO part of the UK MOD and assisted greatly in the marketing of the Mole.
Their demonstrations and trials work initiated a number of contracts for Global Technical Ltd.
At no point, despite knowing the Home office views, did the REEST, DESO, MOD stop the marketing of the Mole. Why? Because they knew it worked. Would the UK military really demonstrate an explosives detection device that just didn't work!
The UKTI, DESO, REEST, FCO, MOD, Home Office all knew of the Mole but instead of turning a blind eye actually got involved in its marketing around the world.
Gary Bolton made a submission to the House of Commons select committee in support of SMEs.
First orders made overseas of Mole.
DTI assist with applications to gain contracts for Sydney Olympics.
2000
Cyprus Police introduced to Mole By UK Defence Attache Col Criten Wakelin as he had heard good things about the device from the UK and they introduced to Interpol.
Works begins with Netherlands Antilles Coastguard after being approached by them for trials. Reference came via the Maltese. Purchase made after successful trial. [This will be expanded in a separate section]
Irish Defence force attend Demonstration at REEST, Chattendean. Purchase made after.
Heather Vousden/Heather Bolton and Gary Bolton attend demo.
REEST make demonstrations to Metropolitan Police, Customs, DoT, Prisons.
Heather Vousden/Heather Bolton and Gary Bolton attend demo.
Trials then progress with Metropolitan Police, Prisons and Customs. [Detailed in separate section]
2001
Controlled tests made by US DEA in Peru despite knowledge of the Quadro Tracker. Purchase made.
BBC Tomorrows World Programme [separate section]
Orders to 5 different countries.
Indian Delegation Ministry of Defence visit UK. Global Technical Ltd attend and provide Mole demonstration at Chattendean by REEST.
Heather Vousden/Heather Bolton and Gary Bolton attend by invitation.
2002
Tests and trials provided to Australian Law enforcement. Purchase made .
Sandia Test Made [ Separate section]
London Chamber of Commerce provide assistance for UN contracts.
Public Security Exhibition held at the UK embassy Belgium for Mole.
Contracts with 7 countries
2003
British Military Mission In Saudi Arabia recommend the Mole to the Crown Prince Guard after successful trials witnessed. UK MOD represented by Major Peter Hurry.
Contracts with 10 countries
2004
Contracts in 11 Countries
Various REEST visits to exhibitions
2005
Cyprus Police demonstrate Mole to INTERPOL
US embassy order for Guatemala
Contracts in 12 countries
British American Tobacco order Mole
David Vousden makes demonstrations and Training on GT200
2006
US embassy order for Guatemala
Contracts in 12 countries
Tender made for Police Service Northern Ireland
CITIES secretariat positive reports for ivory detection
UKTI assist with Panama Canal Security Project
Explosives license applied for via Kent Police
2007
Contracts with 17 countries
Phare project approve GT200 for EU border control use.
2008
Contracts with 14 countries
False GT200 factory shutdown by China Public Security Bureau.
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office assist with UN contracts
Cyprus Police request upgrade for GT200
Heather Bolton travels to UAE
Gary Bolton, David Vousden travel to complete training commitments in Africa, Far east and South America.
2009
Contracts with 10 countries
GT200 stopped at UK customs after being checked for export license. Item released after no license confirmed as being required.
David Vousden and Andrew Mcguire make demonstrations and training in Mexico and Thailand extensively including other countries
Gary Bolton travels to oversea training commitment.
Heather Bolton travels to UAE.
Doesn't this letter state that DESO was part of MOD!! The UK Government are always trying to say the MOD didn't help.
2010
David Vousden, Heather Bolton take over the running of Global Technical Ltd
David Vousden, Andrew Mcguire travel extensively to Mexico and Thailand to conduct training
Separate sections will be made for the following subjects
Thailand
China
Mexico
REEST
Netherlands Antilles Coastguard
UK Government
BBC
The device began as the Mole Programmable system. This device was introduced to Global Technical Ltd by Malcolm Rowe. Global Technical Ltd were acting as a sales agent for him.
Malcolm Rowe was interviewed by Police but no charge!
The Mole was introduced to the UK Home office and related to tracking was found to be an interesting item of technology; some members of the organisation were not convinced but no-one thought it fraud.
Tim Sheldon of the Home office in 2000 stated that the product was odd and the technology seemingly related to water divining and followed up this comment with 'If it works on a 'water divining ' principle , this is not an area where we have ANY expertise. Experiments in this area are fraught with difficulty and there is a high potential for all concerned to come out looking stupid and gullible. In other words we will be ridiculed by other scientists if we show it works.
In addition he stated 'It would be hard to defend the operational use of a device which works on no known physical principle even if trials showed that it had some capability' The Mole was never going to be accepted even with positive trials.
The Home office choose not to take any action as they do not consider it to be fraudulent.
Global Technical Ltd is allowed to continue its company activities.
This set the scene for the next 15 years.
1999
In 1999 the British Army; Royal Engineers Export Support team [REEST] were introduced to the Mole and while sceptical were accepting after their initial trials.
Based on their initial trials they offered Global Technical ltd a private venture report - an operational assessment of the Mole. This proved the system worked.
The Royal Engineers Export Support team worked with Global Technical Ltd for 6 years making demonstrations, making tests, advising overseas clients as to the Mole's benefits, and marketing.
REEST are part of DESO part of the UK MOD and assisted greatly in the marketing of the Mole.
Their demonstrations and trials work initiated a number of contracts for Global Technical Ltd.
At no point, despite knowing the Home office views, did the REEST, DESO, MOD stop the marketing of the Mole. Why? Because they knew it worked. Would the UK military really demonstrate an explosives detection device that just didn't work!
The UKTI, DESO, REEST, FCO, MOD, Home Office all knew of the Mole but instead of turning a blind eye actually got involved in its marketing around the world.
Gary Bolton made a submission to the House of Commons select committee in support of SMEs.
First orders made overseas of Mole.
DTI assist with applications to gain contracts for Sydney Olympics.
2000
Cyprus Police introduced to Mole By UK Defence Attache Col Criten Wakelin as he had heard good things about the device from the UK and they introduced to Interpol.
Works begins with Netherlands Antilles Coastguard after being approached by them for trials. Reference came via the Maltese. Purchase made after successful trial. [This will be expanded in a separate section]
 |
| Rob Wesdorp seen centre during trials of Mole |
Irish Defence force attend Demonstration at REEST, Chattendean. Purchase made after.
Heather Vousden/Heather Bolton and Gary Bolton attend demo.
REEST make demonstrations to Metropolitan Police, Customs, DoT, Prisons.
Heather Vousden/Heather Bolton and Gary Bolton attend demo.
Trials then progress with Metropolitan Police, Prisons and Customs. [Detailed in separate section]
 |
| 3rd from left Cpl Forde REEST training photo from UAE for Mole |
 |
| In uniform Cpl Forde REEST training Global Technical Ltd clients in the UK |
Controlled tests made by US DEA in Peru despite knowledge of the Quadro Tracker. Purchase made.
BBC Tomorrows World Programme [separate section]
Orders to 5 different countries.
Indian Delegation Ministry of Defence visit UK. Global Technical Ltd attend and provide Mole demonstration at Chattendean by REEST.
Heather Vousden/Heather Bolton and Gary Bolton attend by invitation.
2002
Tests and trials provided to Australian Law enforcement. Purchase made .
Sandia Test Made [ Separate section]
London Chamber of Commerce provide assistance for UN contracts.
Public Security Exhibition held at the UK embassy Belgium for Mole.
Contracts with 7 countries
2003
British Military Mission In Saudi Arabia recommend the Mole to the Crown Prince Guard after successful trials witnessed. UK MOD represented by Major Peter Hurry.
Contracts with 10 countries
2004
Contracts in 11 Countries
Various REEST visits to exhibitions
2005
Cyprus Police demonstrate Mole to INTERPOL
US embassy order for Guatemala
Contracts in 12 countries
British American Tobacco order Mole
David Vousden makes demonstrations and Training on GT200
2006
US embassy order for Guatemala
Contracts in 12 countries
Tender made for Police Service Northern Ireland
CITIES secretariat positive reports for ivory detection
UKTI assist with Panama Canal Security Project
Explosives license applied for via Kent Police
2007
Contracts with 17 countries
Phare project approve GT200 for EU border control use.
2008
Contracts with 14 countries
False GT200 factory shutdown by China Public Security Bureau.
UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office assist with UN contracts
Cyprus Police request upgrade for GT200
Heather Bolton travels to UAE
Gary Bolton, David Vousden travel to complete training commitments in Africa, Far east and South America.
2009
Contracts with 10 countries
GT200 stopped at UK customs after being checked for export license. Item released after no license confirmed as being required.
David Vousden and Andrew Mcguire make demonstrations and training in Mexico and Thailand extensively including other countries
Gary Bolton travels to oversea training commitment.
Heather Bolton travels to UAE.
Doesn't this letter state that DESO was part of MOD!! The UK Government are always trying to say the MOD didn't help.
2010
David Vousden, Heather Bolton take over the running of Global Technical Ltd
David Vousden, Andrew Mcguire travel extensively to Mexico and Thailand to conduct training
Separate sections will be made for the following subjects
Thailand
China
Mexico
REEST
Netherlands Antilles Coastguard
UK Government
BBC
Friday, 9 August 2013
BBC
The BBC made a newsnight programme about bomb detectors and made exaggerations and even lied about government statements.
Why did the BBC make the initial programme? The BBC never break stories, this is the realm of the independents.
They had a computer programmer dissect sensor cards and he couldn't find anything programmable, why would he know what he was looking for? They may as well have had a butcher take it apart and comment. If you were shown a DVD, would you know what was on it unless you had the appropriate reader.
The explosives expert, yes he is an explosives expert but not an expert in detection based on the GT200 method.
Again, the general public would not know the difference but it makes a good story doesn't it.
Now let us look further back in time and see what the BBC have been up to that they failed to mention.
Shortly after 9 11 they contact the British Army to see if there was anything new and interesting. Guess what they replied! Yes, we have something interesting, it is called the Mole and we would be prepared to present it on Tomorrows World, a prime time, widely recognised science programme of the day.
The REEST seek approval and get it from the chain of command to present it on the BBC programme.
How did the REEST get approval; the Mole must have worked or why would the UK Ministry of Defence show something that was completely useless.
Remember this is 2 years after the REEST made the report on a device that was useless!
Confusing isn't it, why show it when it doesn't work. Well by now even you must be able to answer that one easily.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gdIhnqaBM8&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Is this the programme the BBC tried to erase? Why is it not on their archives?
Interesting that the BBC have never explained they were party to a massive amount of exposure to the Mole.
John Gregg
He stated that he couldn't understand how it worked, like it was paranormal. He did not believe in paranormal but would keep an open mind.
Utter nonsense
Strange how moving forward 10 years at the trial he things differently.
He thought the BBC set him up, he thought it was a scam, don't remember that being said on the programme. He was asked why he did not just walk away from the programme if he thought it was just a wind up. He said he had promised the BBC he would comment. What an idiot, if you thought it was a scam, you would walk away BBC or not.
He was a prosecution witness. When asked why his view was different now to then he said 'I have to consider my reputation and that of Oxford University'. So now he is scared to admit that he saw it work, cannot state how and like every other narrow minded scientist says it couldn't possibly work despite the fact that the army presented it and he was happy previously to say people have to keep an open mind.
Mr John Gregg has not got an open mind, he has seen it work, cannot explain it and now since the media highlighted the case has chosen to do a u turn. Coward.
Why did the BBC not mention this programme.
Did the government colude with the BBC make a massive fuss of the issue and as they are Nationlised can be controlled? The government accepted the lies they stated on Newsnight and just like every other news organisation failed to actually look into the subject properly as they need a new story, a new victim every 24 hours, read through the various reports, carefully look at the accuracy and you will see confusion about which company has done what, who sold to who and a good example is the BBC stating Global Technical Ltd made £45 million.
How stupid and lazy. Look at the records in companies house and see the actual turnover. See how different the truth is, but who really cares about the truth. We just accept blindly what we are fed and do not question anything.
Here the government know the BBC have lied but it suits the occasion so let it go.
The media are not expected to be truthful, exactly why there was a Leveson enquiry.
Collusion with the UK Police
but MOD is trying to back peddle
Why did the BBC make the initial programme? The BBC never break stories, this is the realm of the independents.
They had a computer programmer dissect sensor cards and he couldn't find anything programmable, why would he know what he was looking for? They may as well have had a butcher take it apart and comment. If you were shown a DVD, would you know what was on it unless you had the appropriate reader.
The explosives expert, yes he is an explosives expert but not an expert in detection based on the GT200 method.
Again, the general public would not know the difference but it makes a good story doesn't it.
Now let us look further back in time and see what the BBC have been up to that they failed to mention.
Shortly after 9 11 they contact the British Army to see if there was anything new and interesting. Guess what they replied! Yes, we have something interesting, it is called the Mole and we would be prepared to present it on Tomorrows World, a prime time, widely recognised science programme of the day.
The REEST seek approval and get it from the chain of command to present it on the BBC programme.
How did the REEST get approval; the Mole must have worked or why would the UK Ministry of Defence show something that was completely useless.
Remember this is 2 years after the REEST made the report on a device that was useless!
Confusing isn't it, why show it when it doesn't work. Well by now even you must be able to answer that one easily.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gdIhnqaBM8&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Is this the programme the BBC tried to erase? Why is it not on their archives?
Interesting that the BBC have never explained they were party to a massive amount of exposure to the Mole.
John Gregg
He stated that he couldn't understand how it worked, like it was paranormal. He did not believe in paranormal but would keep an open mind.
Strange how moving forward 10 years at the trial he things differently.
He thought the BBC set him up, he thought it was a scam, don't remember that being said on the programme. He was asked why he did not just walk away from the programme if he thought it was just a wind up. He said he had promised the BBC he would comment. What an idiot, if you thought it was a scam, you would walk away BBC or not.
He was a prosecution witness. When asked why his view was different now to then he said 'I have to consider my reputation and that of Oxford University'. So now he is scared to admit that he saw it work, cannot state how and like every other narrow minded scientist says it couldn't possibly work despite the fact that the army presented it and he was happy previously to say people have to keep an open mind.
Mr John Gregg has not got an open mind, he has seen it work, cannot explain it and now since the media highlighted the case has chosen to do a u turn. Coward.
Why did the BBC not mention this programme.
Did the government colude with the BBC make a massive fuss of the issue and as they are Nationlised can be controlled? The government accepted the lies they stated on Newsnight and just like every other news organisation failed to actually look into the subject properly as they need a new story, a new victim every 24 hours, read through the various reports, carefully look at the accuracy and you will see confusion about which company has done what, who sold to who and a good example is the BBC stating Global Technical Ltd made £45 million.
How stupid and lazy. Look at the records in companies house and see the actual turnover. See how different the truth is, but who really cares about the truth. We just accept blindly what we are fed and do not question anything.
Here the government know the BBC have lied but it suits the occasion so let it go.
The media are not expected to be truthful, exactly why there was a Leveson enquiry.
Collusion with the UK Police
but MOD is trying to back peddle
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)