Sunday, 11 August 2013

The UK Government part 3

and look here, oops the MOD did help, a lot, what can we do now, how embarrassing for HMG.





Oh, look , no procedure records exist for the REEST, no Original report. Convenient.

Embarrassment is possible for the MOD.
How can the MOD and HMG support a company for 10 years then make a 180 degree turn and then say 'sorry we lead you to buy the GT200 but now you must be stupid for having done so and really stupid for believing the UK government were honest!!'


Oh look here, the government say the EST are not MOD, MOD had nothing to do with promoting the GT200, but read further and it says under SECTION 12 that DSO called the unit the BRITISH ARMY EST. So where are the lies from Global Technical Ltd. Is this not what they said that the UK MOD supported them.
It is incredible to believe that any EST member exhibiting UK kit overseas is going to say when asked 'sorry cannot tell you if this kit is good or bad but who cares it makes the country money'






The UK government have known since GTL inception about the Mole/GT200 and that many people knew it worked and so did nothing what changed










These are the official lines to 'explain' endorsement of products,
Says above that companies will not be supported by HMG if they are likely to embarrass them, yet Global Technical Ltd was supported by HMG, how did that happen? It cannot be because everybody having used the GT200/Mole actually thought it worked was it? But didn't PSDB say it did not work. Make your mind up guys!!

Why wasn't Global Technical Ltd prosecuted?



UK endorsement, of course they endorsed the GT200.